Srb Surgical Operations Text And Atlas Pdf 28
in the control group, facial features including supraorbital rim, shape of ipsilateral forehead, shape of contralateral forehead, and ipsilateral temporal constriction were evaluated. the results showed that the majority of patients in the control group had no apparent anomalies, category i (no imperfections noted) for the following characteristics analyzed: supraorbital rim elevation (vertical dystopia) 100% (40 cases); shape of ipsilateral forehead (vertical dystopia) 75% (30 cases); shape of contralateral forehead 100% (40 cases); and ipsilateral temporal constriction 75% (30 cases) ( table 2 ). in the remainder of cases the appearance was category iia (minor imperfections noted, but no surgical revision performed or planned) for the same characteristics (supraorbital rim elevation (vertical dystopia) 25% [10 cases]; shape of ipsilateral forehead (vertical dystopia) 12.5% [5 cases]; shape of contralateral forehead 12.5% [5 cases]; and ipsilateral temporal constriction 12.5% [5 cases]) ( table 2 ). no patient had phenotypic characteristics classified as category iib (minor imperfections that required minor soft-tissue or bone contouring revisions), category iii (major bony or soft-tissue imperfections that required major alternative osteotomies for bone grafting), or category iv (severe relapse that required repetition of the original surgery) ( table 2 ).
Srb Surgical Operations Text And Atlas Pdf 28
within the surgical group, 6 patients (42%) had no apparent anomalies (category i) at the time of analysis for facial features including supraorbital rim elevation (vertical dystopia) 85% (5 cases), shape of ipsilateral forehead (vertical dystopia) 85% (5 cases), shape of contralateral forehead 100% (5 cases), and ipsilateral temporal constriction 85% (5 cases). in the remainder of cases the appearance was category iia (minor imperfections noted, but no surgical revision performed or planned) for the same characteristics (supraorbital rim elevation (vertical dystopia) 15% [7 cases]; shape of ipsilateral forehead (vertical dystopia) 15% [7 cases]; shape of contralateral forehead 5% [2 cases]; and ipsilateral temporal constriction 15% [7 cases]) ( table 3 ). no patient had phenotypic characteristics classified as category iib (minor imperfections that required minor soft-tissue or bone contouring revisions), category iii (major bony or soft-tissue imperfections that required major alternative osteotomies for bone grafting), or category iv (severe relapse that required repetition of the original surgery) ( table 3 ).